Is it strong enough for an intervention?

Like the minimum effective dosage concept, sometimes variables such as food or working out need to be strong enough for an intervention. For example, one study on phytonutrients showed poor results and even may have expedited cancer.

 

This goes against earlier research in labs where phytonutrients were tested at a molecular level. Who were the samples? Smokers! Not just early smokers but smokers who were older. No wonder certain phytonutrients may not have worked, smokers maybe doing more harm to their bodies than a phytonutrient could help. It gets even more complicated if you remember everything else in the article.

For example, it may not have been an effective dose and if it’s a cumulative effect, smoking may have been counter-acting its effect meaning larger sums of the phytonutrient may have been needed. Studies such as these and anything science claim based should be met with critical thinking and skeptical optimism both good and bad.

Sera doesn't make any absurd claims, it provides a 110% money back promise, if your energy increase isn't as much as you think it should be then get your money back. The promise is made this way to insure every product is created with high quality ingredients and effective science.