Showing posts with label quality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label quality. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Reverse correlation Pt 3

I like to refer to this as ‘chicken or the egg’ as sometimes it can be difficult to establish the direction of a correlation. For example, research on reading has shown poorer readers make more erratic movements and more stops per line. Some educators believed that eye muscles must have been poor or not trained properly. So eye movement training programs were developed and administered to elementary school children. It turns out that poor readers have these erratic movements by having slower recognition of words and difficulties in comprehension. Training elementary children to comprehend words more effectively led to smoother eye movements. Where training eye movements didn’t improve reading comprehension. Another example, research on altruism has correlated that people who do volunteer work are happier than those who do not. So is it that volunteer work creates happier people or do happier people do volunteer work?

Reverse correlations are sometimes difficult to notice. Everyone falls prey to these kinds of thinking at one time or another even the most successful scientists, business people, government officials and so on.  Critical thinking requires experience and time on task to discover additional issues. Sometimes a fresh mind is also needed, the ability to look at a problem in a different aspect. 

 

Don't get caught with shoddy supplements. Sera is the only focus boosting supplement of its kind.

Monday, May 23, 2011

Correlation and Causation Pt 2

Correlation and Causation

At the beginning of my scholarly activities, we were taught ad nauseam a simple phrase “Correlation does not mean causation”.  This simple little phrase helped me on more than one occasion and beyond just a test in a class. For example in 1975 a study in Taiwan looked at contraceptives, they collected data on a wide range of variables and the variable that most strongly related to contraceptive use was the number of electrical appliances in the home. Great, now we can start handing out microwaves to every child in school, but everyone knows that is silly. Just because there is, a strong correlation doesn’t mean that is the causation. I doubt very much that providing microwaves, toasters, fans etc. will increase the use of contraceptives. What is known is there is a relationship between the two and that is all a correlation tells anyone. Perhaps the number of appliances is reflective of socioeconomic status (SES) like education and occupation. SES is now generally accepted as a reflective measure of contraceptive use.  So while the study was looking for the highest relationship it turns out that the two strongest relationships were actually linked to a totally separate variable SES.

This example brings me to what is called the third variable problem in correlations. While there may be a strong relationship, it may be due to both of the variables being linked to a third variable. Contraceptive use and number of appliances in the house for example may have a strong correlation between the education, occupation and income levels of the house. This example is so obvious that many simply find it humorous to think about providing appliances as a way to increase contraceptive use.

Yet this happens all the time with problems that are extremely complex. Take for example global warming, not to get political, but if people place upon their heads the critical thinking caps they may find their maybe third variables involved and illusory correlations. It is possible that the earth’s orbit maybe increasing temperature, shifts in magnetic poles causing disturbances in the atmosphere are a few potential examples. It may be harder to find additional reasons for why the ozone layer is being depleted but what about certain rays and beams of gamma radiation blasts may potentially upset our environment. While these maybe less frequented views, it is still possible and I didn’t bother to dig anything on it to see if they have been disproven.

                Correlational data has always gotten the best of us, even as scientists. It is a starting point for some discoveries and the only means for scientific exploration in others. We simply cannot build two solar systems and have one with no vehicles and one with. 

 

Want to increase your energy? Get Sera now, they think critically.